Opens in a new tab
Contact Us
  // Open Popup ID 1058 if any element with .header--nav__button
document.querySelectorAll('.header-nav-button').forEach( (el) => {
	el.addEventListener('click', () => {
		bricksOpenPopup(XXX)
	})
})
document.querySelectorAll('.header-nav--parent').forEach(li => {
  const toggle = li.querySelector('.brx-submenu-toggle');
  if (!toggle) return;

  const a = toggle.querySelector('a');
  const button = toggle.querySelector('button');
  if (!a || !button) return;

  // Move the label text into the button (prepend before the SVG)
  const labelText = document.createTextNode(a.textContent);
  button.prepend(labelText);

  // Remove the <a> tag
  a.remove();
});

Why businesses work with Wingate?

Whichever consultant and support team you work with you get a “WOW” service, because that’s the ‘Wingate way’.

FAQ Index

Why Wingate

  • How much should I expect to pay for an employee benefits adviser

    There is no single standard price for an employee benefits adviser because the amount an employer pays depends on both the services provided and how the adviser is remunerated. An adviser may charge an explicit fee, receive commission included within insurance premiums, or use a combination of the two.

    The important figure is therefore not simply the fee shown on an invoice. Employers should understand the adviser’s total remuneration across their benefits programme and how it changes as premiums or employee numbers increase.

    Where commission is calculated as a percentage of premium, the adviser’s remuneration can rise when the insurance premium rises, even if the scope of work has not increased.

    Why this matters

    Employee benefits advice can appear to be free, or relatively inexpensive, where the adviser is remunerated through insurer commission rather than an invoice to the employer. However, commission is still remuneration for the adviser.

    The FCA Handbook – ICOBS 4.3 Remuneration disclosure describes a fee as remuneration paid directly by the customer and commission as remuneration included in the premium. It also expressly recognises that an intermediary can be paid through a combination of different forms of remuneration.

    This makes it important to distinguish between how an adviser is paid and how much the adviser is paid.

    For example, if commission is expressed as a percentage of an insurance premium, a significant premium increase may also increase the commission paid. An employer reviewing costs should therefore look at the remuneration in pounds as well as percentages, and consider whether the remuneration remains reasonable for the work and service being provided.

    What the answer depends on

    The appropriate cost will depend on factors such as:

    • the number of employees and complexity of the workforce;
    • which benefits are being advised on and administered;
    • the amount of insurer market review and negotiation required;
    • whether the adviser provides ongoing consultancy, employee communications or administration;
    • the level of claims and renewal support;
    • whether remuneration is a fixed fee, commission or both;
    • whether commission varies with premiums;
    • whether additional remuneration or benefits are received from insurers or elsewhere in the distribution chain.

    For insurance business, FCA rules require intermediaries to disclose the nature of their remuneration and whether they work on the basis of a fee, commission, another type of remuneration, or a combination. Where a fee is payable, the amount, or where necessary its basis of calculation, must be disclosed before the customer becomes liable to pay it.

    Commercial customers also have an important additional right. If they request it, an insurance intermediary must promptly disclose the commission it and its associates receive in connection with a policy, normally in cash terms. FCA guidance says this should encompass forms of remuneration including profit-sharing and volume-related arrangements.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, our preferred route is set fee’s based on product and headcounts as we believe in transparency with our clients. This then means there is no conflict if premiums rise and therefore commission rises too. That said, where it makes supports a client based on their set up for Wingate to receive commission, we are open to review this. Any excess commission is refunded or offset against fees.

    A sensible remuneration review could compare, benefit by benefit:

    • annual premium;
    • commission percentage, where applicable;
    • commission received in pounds;
    • separate consultancy or administration fees;
    • any other relevant remuneration;
    • total adviser remuneration;
    • services provided in return.

    It is also worth modelling what happens if premiums rise.

    For example, purely as an illustration, £200,000 of premium with remuneration calculated at 10% would produce £20,000. If the premium subsequently increased to £300,000 and the percentage remained unchanged, the remuneration would increase to £30,000.

    That does not make percentage commission inherently inappropriate. The question is whether the resulting remuneration and incentives remain appropriate for the service provided. FCA rules also restrict remuneration arrangements that conflict with customers’ best interests or could incentivise an insurance distributor to recommend a particular contract when another would better meet the customer’s needs.

    What to do before acting

    Before appointing an employee benefits adviser, or when reviewing an existing arrangement, ask for a clear breakdown of all remuneration associated with the programme, including fees and insurer commission, expressed in pounds wherever possible.

    Then compare the remuneration with the agreed scope of work and model how it would change if premiums, employee numbers or benefit structures changed.

    Employers should avoid comparing advisers on a quoted fee alone. A proposition with a low explicit fee but substantial commission may cost more overall than a transparent fee-based arrangement, while in other circumstances commission may provide a practical and proportionate way to pay for the service. The comparison needs to be made on total remuneration, service and value rather than one number in isolation.

  • Why might a business benefit from using an employee benefits adviser?

    An employee benefits adviser can help a business design, review and communicate workplace benefits so they support both employees and the organisation’s objectives. This may include pensions, life assurance, income protection, private medical insurance, salary sacrifice arrangements and wider financial wellbeing support.

    A good adviser does more than compare providers. They help employers understand costs, value, employee engagement, governance requirements and the practical impact of benefits on recruitment and retention.

    Why this matters

    Many employers invest significant sums in benefits that employees do not fully understand or value. Poorly structured arrangements can increase costs, create administrative burdens or fail to meet workforce needs. Regular reviews can help ensure benefits remain competitive and fit for purpose.

    What the answer depends on

    The value of an employee benefits adviser depends on:

    • the size and demographics of the workforce;
    • the benefits already in place;
    • budget constraints;
    • pension and protection arrangements;
    • tax and salary sacrifice opportunities;
    • employee engagement levels;
    • regulatory and governance requirements.

    A key trap is focusing only on headline costs rather than overall value, employee take-up and long-term outcomes.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually look beyond individual benefits and consider how the package fits into the wider wellbeing of employees and the business. The cheapest solution is not always the best solution. An adviser would normally assess cost, tax efficiency, employee needs, communication, provider quality and the longer-term objectives of the business.

    What to do before acting

    Review your current benefits package, provider charges, employee participation rates and any feedback from staff. Identify which benefits are valued, which are underused and whether there are gaps in protection, retirement planning or financial wellbeing support. This creates a stronger basis for evaluating whether professional benefits advice could add value.

  • How does Wingate keep up to date with changes to employee benefits and pension legislation?

    Keeping up to date with employee benefit and pension legislation requires continual monitoring rather than occasional reviews. Pension, tax and workplace benefit rules can change through Budgets, Finance Acts, HMRC guidance, FCA regulation, DWP policy changes and pension-specific legislation.

    A financial planning firm would normally follow updates from regulators and government departments, undertake ongoing professional development, review technical publications and monitor consultations and regulatory announcements. This helps ensure that planning recommendations reflect current rules and emerging developments rather than relying on outdated assumptions.

    Why this matters

    Seemingly small legislative changes can have significant consequences for pension contributions, tax relief, retirement options, inheritance planning, employee benefits and long-term financial plans. Missing a rule change may mean lost tax opportunities, unexpected charges or decisions that are difficult to reverse.

    What the answer depends on

    The impact of legislative change depends on the type of pension involved, employment status, tax position, age, benefit structure and wider financial circumstances. Some changes affect all savers, while others only apply to specific groups, such as higher earners, business owners, public sector scheme members or people already drawing benefits.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually look beyond the rule change itself and assess how it interacts with the wider financial plan. A pension rule change may affect ISA planning, retirement income strategy, estate planning, business extraction decisions or family wealth planning. The technical rule is important, but the practical effect on long-term outcomes is usually more important.

    What to do before acting

    Before making changes to pensions or employee benefits based on a news headline or announced reform, check whether the change has actually become law, when it takes effect and whether transitional rules apply. It is also worth reviewing how the change fits with your broader financial objectives rather than focusing solely on tax or pension rules in isolation. Using a employee benefits adviser can be a big help.

^ Back to Top ^

Business Challenges

  • How can employers control benefits costs while still offering a competitive employee benefits package?

    Controlling benefits costs does not necessarily mean reducing benefits. In many cases, employers achieve better results by focusing spending on benefits that employees actually value rather than offering a long list of underused perks. A competitive package should meet legal obligations, support workforce needs and help attract and retain the right people, while remaining affordable over the long term.

    The most effective approach is usually to prioritise high-value benefits, regularly review usage and employee feedback, and align spending with business objectives rather than following market trends alone.

    Why this matters

    Benefits costs can rise quickly, particularly for healthcare, insurance and wellbeing programmes. At the same time, a weak benefits package can increase recruitment costs, employee turnover and absence rates.

    The challenge is not simply spending less. It is spending in the areas that deliver the greatest value for both employees and the business.

    What the answer depends on

    The right balance will depend on:

    • Workforce demographics and employee priorities.
    • Recruitment and retention challenges.
    • Available budget and profit margins.
    • Existing benefits participation rates.
    • Whether benefits are employer-funded, employee-funded or offered through salary sacrifice arrangements.
    • Industry norms and competitive pressures.
    • The organisation’s growth plans and workforce strategy.

    Common mistakes include offering benefits that employees rarely use, failing to communicate existing benefits properly, or introducing expensive schemes without measuring their impact.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually start by understanding what employees value most rather than assuming more benefits are always better. A smaller number of well-targeted benefits can often deliver greater engagement than a broad package with low participation.

    We would also consider benefits alongside the wider reward strategy. For example, pension contributions, health benefits, flexible working arrangements and wellbeing support may all affect recruitment, retention and employee satisfaction differently. The objective is normally to maximise value per pound spent rather than simply minimise costs.

    What to do before acting

    Before making changes, review:

    • Current benefits costs by benefit type.
    • Employee take-up and utilisation rates.
    • Employee survey feedback.
    • Recruitment and retention data.
    • Benchmarking against similar employers.
    • Tax efficiency opportunities, including salary sacrifice where appropriate.

    This can help identify benefits that should be expanded, redesigned or removed, while ensuring spending remains aligned with employee needs and business goals.

  • Which employee benefits are most effective at improving staff retention?

    The benefits that tend to have the greatest impact on staff retention are those that improve financial security, wellbeing, work-life balance and career development. While salary remains important, many employees decide whether to stay based on the overall employment package rather than pay alone.

    Benefits commonly associated with stronger retention include employer pension contributions, private medical insurance, health cash plans, income protection, life assurance, flexible working, enhanced family leave, wellbeing support and professional development opportunities.

    Why this matters

    Replacing experienced employees is expensive and can disrupt client relationships, productivity and team morale. Retention-focused benefits can help employers reduce turnover while improving engagement and job satisfaction.

    What the answer depends on

    The most effective benefits vary by workforce demographic:

    • Younger employees may value career development, flexible working and financial wellbeing support.
    • Mid-career employees often place greater value on healthcare, family benefits and pension contributions.
    • Older employees may prioritise retirement planning, health cover and greater flexibility.
    • Different sectors and salary levels can produce different benefit preferences.

    A common mistake is investing in benefits employees do not understand or value. Communication and accessibility are often as important as the benefit itself.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually view retention through a total reward lens rather than focusing on a single benefit. The strongest retention strategies often combine:

    • Competitive pension provision.
    • Meaningful health and wellbeing support.
    • Flexible working arrangements.
    • Financial education and support.
    • Opportunities for progression and development.

    A modest increase in salary may have a shorter-term effect than a well-designed benefits package that supports employees throughout different stages of life.

    What to do before acting

    Review employee demographics, turnover data and benefit take-up rates before adding new benefits. Employee surveys can help identify which benefits are genuinely valued rather than assumed to be important. Consider the cost of each benefit against the potential savings from improved retention and reduced recruitment costs.

  • Can employee benefits reduce absenteeism and presenteeism at work?

    Yes, employee benefits can help reduce both absenteeism and presenteeism when they address the underlying causes of poor health, stress, financial worries and caring responsibilities. Absenteeism refers to people being away from work due to illness or other issues. Presenteeism occurs when people attend work but are not performing at their best because of physical, mental or personal challenges.

    The most effective benefits are usually those that provide early intervention, improve access to healthcare, support mental wellbeing and reduce financial stress. Simply offering more benefits is rarely enough. Employees need to understand, value and actively use them.

    Why this matters

    Many employers focus on sickness absence because it is visible and measurable. However, presenteeism can often have a greater impact on productivity, customer service and employee wellbeing.

    Benefits such as health cash plans, digital GP access, employee assistance programmes (EAPs), mental health support, financial wellbeing services and physiotherapy can help employees access support earlier and prevent issues from becoming long-term absences.

    What the answer depends on

    The impact of benefits depends on:

    • The main causes of absence within the workforce
    • Employee awareness and engagement with available benefits
    • Management support and workplace culture
    • Access to occupational health and wellbeing services
    • Whether benefits are preventative or only provide support once a problem exists
    • The age profile and life stage of employees

    For example, a workforce experiencing high levels of stress may benefit most from mental health and financial wellbeing support, while a workforce with a high incidence of musculoskeletal issues may see greater value from physiotherapy and healthcare benefits.

    How Wingate would look at this

    Although employee benefits can improve wellbeing, the strongest outcomes usually come when benefits are aligned to workforce needs rather than selected in isolation.

    A benefits consultant would normally review absence data, employee feedback, health risks, demographic trends and benefit utilisation levels before assessing which interventions are likely to deliver the greatest return. The goal is not simply to increase benefit spend, but to improve employee outcomes and productivity.

    What to do before acting

    Review:

    • Absence data by cause and duration
    • Employee wellbeing survey results
    • Existing benefit utilisation rates
    • EAP usage trends
    • Healthcare claims data where available
    • Workforce demographic information

    This can help identify whether the greatest opportunity lies in mental health support, healthcare access, financial wellbeing programmes, family support or preventative health initiatives.

  • How do employee benefits help attract and retain talented employees?

    A well-designed benefits package can play an important role in both attracting new employees and encouraging existing employees to stay. While salary remains important, many candidates now compare employers on factors such as healthcare benefits, pension contributions, life cover, income protection, wellbeing support, flexible working and family-friendly benefits.

    Benefits are often most effective when they reflect the needs of the workforce rather than simply offering the largest number of options. A strong benefits proposition can strengthen an employer’s reputation, improve employee engagement and reduce costly staff turnover.

    Why this matters

    Replacing experienced employees can be expensive and disruptive. Recruitment costs, onboarding, training and lost productivity can quickly exceed the cost of providing valuable benefits. Benefits can also help employers stand out in competitive labour markets where multiple organisations are competing for similar skills.

    What the answer depends on

    The effectiveness of benefits depends on:

    • The demographics and priorities of the workforce.
    • The competitiveness of the local labour market.
    • Whether benefits are understood and valued by employees.
    • How benefits compare with those offered by competitors.
    • The balance between salary, benefits and career development opportunities.
    • The quality of communication and employee engagement around the benefits package.

    A common mistake is focusing solely on adding more benefits rather than ensuring employees understand and actively use existing ones.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually view benefits as part of a broader employee value proposition rather than an isolated reward tool. The strongest recruitment and retention strategies typically combine competitive pay, meaningful benefits, career development opportunities, workplace culture and financial wellbeing support.

    Employers should regularly review benefit usage, employee feedback and workforce demographics to ensure the package continues to meet changing needs. What attracts employees may not be the same as what encourages long-term retention.

    What to do before acting

    Review employee turnover data, recruitment feedback, exit interview themes and benefits usage reports. Identify which groups are hardest to recruit or retain and assess whether targeted benefits could address specific challenges. Measuring participation and employee satisfaction can help determine whether current benefits are delivering value for both employees and the business.

^ Back to Top ^

Employee Benefits

  • What should an employer consider when creating an employee benefits strategy?

    An effective employee benefits strategy starts with a clear business objective rather than a list of benefits. The best strategies are designed to support recruitment, retention, employee wellbeing, productivity and organisational culture while remaining affordable and sustainable.

    Most employers begin by understanding their workforce, identifying the outcomes they want to achieve, reviewing existing benefits, and then prioritising benefits that deliver the greatest value to both employees and the business. Just as importantly, employees need to understand and use the benefits available, so communication should be part of the strategy from the start.

    Why this matters

    Many employers invest significant sums in pensions, healthcare, wellbeing programmes and other benefits but struggle to demonstrate value because the offering is not linked to clear objectives.

    A well-designed strategy can improve employee engagement, support financial wellbeing, strengthen retention and help differentiate an employer in a competitive labour market.

    What the answer depends on

    The right strategy will depend on:

    • Workforce demographics and employee priorities.
    • Business objectives such as retention, recruitment, absence reduction or wellbeing.
    • Budget and long-term affordability.
    • Industry norms and competitor offerings.
    • Legal requirements and pension obligations.
    • Existing reward structures, including salary and bonus arrangements.
    • Whether benefits are intended to support physical health, mental wellbeing, financial wellbeing or family support.

    Common mistakes include copying competitors’ benefits, launching too many low-value benefits, failing to measure outcomes, or assuming employees understand what is available.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually encourage employers to see benefits as part of a broader financial wellbeing and reward strategy rather than a collection of standalone products.

    For example, increasing pension contributions may appear attractive, but it may not address the needs of employees facing short-term financial pressures. An adviser would normally consider how pensions, protection, healthcare, wellbeing support, flexible working and employee communication work together to support employees at different life stages.

    What to do before acting

    Before introducing or changing benefits:

    • Define the business objectives.
    • Survey employees to understand priorities.
    • Review benefit usage and costs.
    • Benchmark against similar employers where appropriate.
    • Assess tax, National Insurance and pension implications.
    • Create a communication plan explaining the value of each benefit.
    • Establish success measures such as retention, engagement, absence levels and employee satisfaction.

    Review the strategy regularly to ensure it remains aligned with workforce needs and business goals.

  • What is the best way to identify the employee benefits that my workforce values most?

    he most reliable way to find out what benefits employees want is to ask them directly and combine that feedback with workforce data. Many employers spend money on benefits that are underused because they rely on assumptions rather than evidence.

    A good process usually includes an anonymous employee survey, focus groups, analysis of benefit take-up rates, and consideration of workforce demographics. The aim is not simply to identify the most popular benefits, but to understand which benefits make the biggest difference to attraction, retention, wellbeing and engagement.

    Why this matters

    Benefits can be a significant cost, but not every benefit delivers equal value to employees. A mismatch between what is offered and what people actually need can lead to low engagement and poor return on investment.

    For example, younger employees may prioritise financial wellbeing support or additional annual leave, while employees with families may place greater value on healthcare, life assurance or flexible working arrangements.

    What the answer depends on

    The right benefits package will depend on:

    • Workforce age profile and life stage
    • Salary levels and financial pressures
    • Family circumstances
    • Existing benefits already in place
    • Business objectives such as retention, recruitment or wellbeing
    • Budget available for benefits

    One common mistake is asking employees to choose from a fixed list. Open-ended questions often reveal needs that management had not considered.

    Another trap is only listening to the loudest voices. Anonymous surveys can provide a more representative picture of employee preferences.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually start by identifying what the business is trying to achieve before reviewing specific benefits. A benefit that improves employee retention, reduces absence or increases engagement may be more valuable than a more expensive benefit with low participation.

    We would also compare what employees say they want against actual usage data. Employees may express interest in certain benefits but make greater use of others when available.

    What to do before acting

    Before making changes:

    • Run a confidential employee benefits survey.
    • Review participation and claims data from existing benefits.
    • Segment results by age, location, role or life stage where appropriate.
    • Rank benefits by both employee demand and business value.
    • Test proposed changes against budget and expected uptake.

    A simple survey covering wellbeing, healthcare, financial support, pensions, flexibility and lifestyle benefits can provide a much clearer picture than benchmarking alone.

  • What are the key employee benefit trends for 2026?

    The main employee benefit trends for 2026 are greater personalisation, stronger financial wellbeing support, expanded mental health provision, preventative healthcare, support for carers and families, and better use of technology to help employees understand and access benefits.

    Employers are increasingly looking beyond traditional benefits such as pension contributions and private medical insurance. The focus is shifting towards benefits that improve day-to-day financial resilience, wellbeing, retention and employee experience. At the same time, rising healthcare costs mean organisations are under pressure to demonstrate value and improve benefit engagement.

    Why this matters

    Many employers invest heavily in benefits that employees either do not fully understand or do not use. In 2026, successful benefit strategies are increasingly focused on relevance, flexibility and communication rather than simply adding more benefits.

    Employees now expect support across physical health, mental wellbeing, financial security, family responsibilities and career development. The benefits package has become a key factor in recruitment, retention and workforce engagement.

    What the answer depends on

    The most relevant trends depend on:

    • Workforce demographics and life stages
    • Business size and budget
    • Recruitment and retention challenges
    • Existing benefit take-up levels
    • Industry expectations
    • Healthcare cost pressures
    • Remote, hybrid or office-based working models

    A common mistake is following market trends without understanding whether employees actually value or use those benefits. Employers should base decisions on workforce data and employee feedback rather than industry headlines alone.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually look at benefits through the lens of employee value, engagement and long-term financial wellbeing.

    For many employers, the biggest opportunities in 2026 are:

    • Financial education and guidance
    • Pension engagement and retirement planning support
    • Health cash plans and preventative healthcare
    • Mental health and wellbeing resources
    • Flexible benefits that reflect different life stages
    • Better communication to improve benefit take-up

    The best benefits strategy is not necessarily the one with the largest budget. It is often the one that helps employees understand, appreciate and use the support already available.

    What to do before acting

    Before introducing new benefits, employers should:

    • Analyse current benefit utilisation
    • Review employee feedback and wellbeing data
    • Identify gaps in financial, health and family support
    • Assess whether existing benefits are being communicated effectively
    • Compare benefit spend with recruitment and retention objectives

    Many organisations discover that improving awareness and education delivers greater value than simply adding new products to the benefits package.

  • Which employee benefits matter most to Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X and Baby Boomers?

    Different generations often value different benefits because they are at different life stages. While flexibility is important across most age groups, younger workers tend to place greater emphasis on mental wellbeing, career development and help with financial pressures, whereas older workers often prioritise healthcare, retirement planning and flexible routes into retirement.

    Employers should be careful not to stereotype people purely by age. Individual circumstances usually matter more than generational labels, but understanding general trends can help shape a more relevant and inclusive benefits package.

    Why this matters

    A benefits package that appeals to a 25-year-old employee may not be as valuable to someone approaching retirement. Employers that understand these differences are often better placed to attract, engage and retain staff.

    Common themes include:

    • Gen Z: flexible working, mental health support, learning opportunities, student debt support and wellbeing benefits.
    • Millennials: flexible working, childcare support, family-friendly policies, mental health resources, financial wellbeing and career progression.
    • Gen X: flexible working, healthcare benefits, financial planning support, caring responsibilities assistance and retirement planning.
    • Baby Boomers: healthcare, preventative health support, flexible retirement options, phased retirement and later-life financial planning.

    What the answer depends on

    The most valued benefits are influenced by:

    • age and life stage;
    • family circumstances;
    • income level and financial security;
    • health considerations;
    • caring responsibilities;
    • retirement proximity;
    • workplace culture and flexibility.

    There is also significant overlap between generations. Flexible working arrangements, good pension provision and health support are consistently valued across the workforce.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually view benefits through the wider lens of wellbeing rather than treating them as isolated perks. For example, a younger employee may value workplace pension contributions because of long-term growth potential, while someone approaching retirement may value pension guidance, health cover and flexible retirement arrangements.

    Employers can often achieve better outcomes by offering a flexible benefits framework that allows people to choose the benefits most relevant to their circumstances.

    What to do before acting

    If you are reviewing an employee benefits package, look beyond headline benefits and consider the demographics of your workforce. Check whether your offering supports early-career employees, people with families, those with caring responsibilities and employees approaching retirement. Staff surveys can help identify priorities that may not be obvious from age profiles alone.

  • What employee benefits are most commonly offered by UK employers?

    The most popular employee benefits offered by UK employers typically combine financial support, healthcare, wellbeing and flexibility. While the exact mix varies by workforce and budget, the benefits that consistently attract attention include workplace pensions, private medical insurance, life assurance, income protection, employee assistance programmes (EAPs), health cash plans, flexible working arrangements, holiday purchase schemes and financial wellbeing support.

    Many employers are also expanding benefits that help employees with day-to-day financial pressures, including salary sacrifice arrangements, discounts, wellbeing allowances and support with retirement planning.

    Why this matters

    Benefits are often one of the largest investments an employer makes after salaries. A well-designed benefits package can help attract and retain staff, improve engagement and support employee wellbeing. However, popularity does not necessarily mean value. A benefit that is highly regarded in one workforce may be underused in another.

    What the answer depends on

    The most appropriate benefits depend on:

    • Workforce demographics and age profile
    • Employee priorities and wellbeing needs
    • Business budget and objectives
    • Existing pension and healthcare provision
    • Recruitment and retention challenges
    • Tax and National Insurance considerations

    A common mistake is focusing on adding more benefits rather than improving communication and participation in existing ones.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually look beyond simple benchmarking. The most effective benefits packages are those that align with employees’ real needs and support broader wellbeing. For many employers, increasing engagement with existing pension, healthcare and wellbeing benefits can produce more value than introducing additional schemes.

    What to do before acting

    Before changing benefits, review employee usage data, participation rates and feedback. Compare this against business objectives such as recruitment, retention, absence management or financial wellbeing. Understanding which benefits employees actually value can prevent unnecessary spending on underused schemes.

  • Which employee benefits do people value most, and why?

    There is no single benefit that every employee values most. However, UK research consistently shows that financial security, flexibility and wellbeing are the areas people care about most. Commonly valued benefits include employer pension contributions, flexible working arrangements, paid sick leave, additional holiday entitlement, private medical cover and financial wellbeing support.

    The most effective benefits package is usually one that reflects different life stages. A younger employee may value flexibility and career development, while someone approaching retirement may place greater importance on pension contributions, healthcare and financial planning support.

    Why this matters

    Employers often spend significant amounts on benefits that employees neither understand nor use. Understanding which benefits people genuinely value can improve engagement, retention and employee wellbeing while making benefit spend more effective.

    For employees, a strong benefits package can be worth thousands of pounds per year beyond salary alone. Pension contributions, healthcare benefits and protection benefits can have a significant long-term financial impact.

    What the answer depends on

    Employee priorities often vary according to:

    • Age and stage of life
    • Family and caring responsibilities
    • Health needs
    • Income level and financial pressures
    • Commuting and working arrangements
    • Retirement planning goals

    A common mistake is assuming salary is the only factor that matters. While pay remains important, surveys increasingly show that flexibility, pension support and wellbeing benefits strongly influence employment decisions.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually distinguish between benefits that feel valuable today and those that create meaningful long-term outcomes.

    For example, an enhanced employer pension contribution may not be noticed as frequently as flexible working, but over a career it can add substantially to retirement security. An adviser would help you understand what benefits align to your culture and goals, and ensure success measurements are implemented to monitor over time.

    What to do before acting

    If you are reviewing a benefits package, list the benefits you currently receive and estimate their financial value. Check employer pension contributions, protection benefits, healthcare cover and any flexible benefits available. The benefits that appear least visible can sometimes provide the greatest long-term financial value.

  • What employee benefits should a business be offering to stay competitive?

    There is no single list of benefits every employer should offer, but most organisations should benchmark their package against employers of a similar size, sector and workforce profile. In the UK, a competitive benefits package often includes pension contributions above the statutory minimum, life assurance, income protection, private medical insurance, holiday flexibility, wellbeing support and family-friendly benefits.

    Why this matters

    Employee expectations change over time. A benefits package that was competitive a few years ago may now be seen as basic. The biggest risk is spending money on benefits that employees do not value while missing benefits that improve recruitment, retention and engagement.

    What the answer depends on

    The right benefits depend on:

    • workforce demographics and age profile;
    • seniority and skill shortages;
    • sector norms;
    • budget and affordability;
    • existing pension and reward structure;
    • employee feedback and benefit take-up rates.

    Common mistakes include copying competitors without understanding employee needs, focusing only on headline benefits and failing to review uptake and value regularly.

    How Wingate would look at this

    We would usually start with benchmark data and then assess whether benefits support the organisation’s wider objectives. The most expensive package is not necessarily the most effective. Pension design, financial wellbeing support and protection benefits often deliver more long-term value than simply adding another perk.

    What to do before acting

    Compare your current package against a recent market benchmark, identify any gaps, review employee usage data and assess the cost versus perceived value of each benefit. Prioritise benefits that address recruitment, retention and employee wellbeing challenges rather than adding benefits solely because competitors offer them.

  • Does my business need a flexible benefits platform?

    A flexible benefits platform is a digital system that allows employees to view, choose and manage workplace benefits in one place. Depending on the platform, employees may be able to select benefits such as pension contributions, health cover, dental insurance, life assurance, gym memberships, wellbeing support, retail discounts or salary sacrifice arrangements.

    Whether you need one depends less on business size and more on the complexity of your benefits package. If you offer multiple benefits, have employees in different locations, or want people to engage more with their benefits, a platform can simplify administration and improve take-up.

    Why this matters

    Many employers spend significant amounts on benefits that employees either do not understand or rarely use. A well-designed platform can improve visibility, reduce administration and help employees appreciate the value of their total reward package.

    What the answer depends on

    The usefulness of a platform will depend on:

    • How many benefits you offer.
    • Whether staff can choose between different benefits.
    • The amount of HR administration involved.
    • Payroll integration requirements.
    • Data security and compliance needs.
    • The level of employee engagement you want to achieve.

    A common trap is buying a platform before reviewing your benefits strategy. A platform can improve delivery, but it cannot compensate for a benefits package that does not meet employee needs.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually start with the objective rather than the technology. The key question is whether a platform helps employees make better decisions and whether it reduces cost and administration for the employer. The best platform is not always the one with the longest feature list. Integration, communication, user experience and ongoing support often matter more than additional functionality.

    What to do before acting

    Review your current benefits offering and identify:

    • Which benefits employees actually use.
    • How much time HR spends administering benefits.
    • Whether employees need greater flexibility and choice.
    • What payroll and HR systems must integrate with a platform.
    • Whether a simpler employee benefits portal would achieve the same outcome.

    Create a list of required features before comparing providers. This often prevents paying for functionality that delivers little practical value.

  • What should be included in a total reward statement?

    A total reward statement should show the full value of an employee’s remuneration package, not just their salary. It would normally include pay, bonuses, pension contributions, employee benefits, and any other workplace rewards that have a measurable value.

    A good statement helps people understand the true value of their employment package and can highlight benefits that might otherwise be overlooked.

    Why this matters

    Many people focus only on basic salary when comparing jobs or assessing their financial position. However, employer pension contributions, life assurance, private medical cover, income protection, holiday entitlement, share schemes and other benefits can represent a significant part of total remuneration.

    For retirement planning, understanding employer pension contributions and long-term benefits can be particularly valuable.

    What the answer depends on

    The contents will vary by employer, but a comprehensive total reward statement would typically include:

    • Basic salary or annual pay
    • Bonus, commission or incentive payments
    • Employer pension contributions
    • Employee pension contributions
    • Pension benefit information, where available
    • Life assurance or death-in-service cover
    • Private medical insurance
    • Income protection or disability benefits
    • Critical illness cover, if provided
    • Holiday entitlement
    • Share schemes or equity awards
    • Car allowance or company car benefits
    • Flexible benefits
    • Health and wellbeing programmes
    • Learning and development support
    • Other employer-funded benefits

    One common trap is assuming every benefit has a straightforward cash value. Some benefits are easy to value, while others, such as pension promises in defined benefit schemes, may require more detailed explanation.

    How Wingate would look at this

    The headline total is often less important than understanding which benefits support your wider plan.

    For example, a high employer pension contribution may be more valuable for long-term retirement planning than a small increase in salary. Equally, life assurance, income protection and medical benefits may provide protection that would be expensive to replace personally.

    At Wingate Benefit Solutions, its about helping you understand how your benefits package can link and support wider business goals. Total reward can help, but often its about communicating the value of benefits rather than the cost of them that will have the most impact.

    What to do before acting

    Review the statement carefully and identify:

    • Which benefits you actively use
    • Which benefits you may have overlooked
    • The level of pension contributions being paid
    • Any protection benefits that your family relies upon
    • Whether there are workplace benefits that could reduce personal expenditure

    If you are comparing employers, considering retirement, or reviewing your wider financial plan, assess the quality and relevance of the benefits rather than focusing solely on the total reported value.

  • How can I benchmark my employee benefits package against other employers?

    Benchmarking your benefits means comparing your employee benefits package against similar employers to see whether it remains competitive, valued and cost-effective. A useful benchmark looks at more than what benefits are offered. It should also consider participation rates, employee feedback, employer cost, business objectives and how your package compares with employers of a similar size, sector and location.

    A benchmarking exercise is often most valuable when it helps answer a business question, such as whether your benefits support recruitment, retention, wellbeing or productivity.

    Why this matters

    Benefits can represent a significant investment, but higher spending does not automatically produce better outcomes. You may be overpaying for benefits that employees rarely use, or missing benefits that people increasingly expect from employers.

    Benchmarking can help identify gaps, reduce wasted spend and provide evidence for future benefits decisions.

    What the answer depends on

    The quality of the benchmark depends on:

    • Whether you are comparing against employers of a similar size and sector.
    • Which benefits are included, such as pensions, healthcare, life assurance, income protection, wellbeing support, flexible working and salary sacrifice arrangements.
    • Employee demographics and workforce needs.
    • Whether you measure benefit take-up and employee satisfaction, not just availability.
    • The objectives of your benefits strategy.

    A common mistake is comparing individual benefits in isolation rather than assessing the overall employee value proposition.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually start with the purpose of the benefits package rather than the benefits themselves. If the goal is staff retention, the question is whether the package helps retain key people. If the goal is financial wellbeing, the package should be assessed against outcomes such as pension engagement, use of wellbeing support and employee feedback.

    The strongest benchmarking exercises combine market data with workforce data. Knowing that a competitor offers a benefit is useful, but understanding whether employees value and use it is often more important.

    What to do before acting

    Before changing your benefits package:

    • Define what success looks like.
    • Gather employee feedback and utilisation data.
    • Compare your package against relevant market benchmarks.
    • Review total employer cost, not just headline benefit costs.
    • Consider whether benefits support wider objectives such as wellbeing, recruitment, retention and retirement planning.

    A structured review often produces better decisions than simply adding benefits that appear popular elsewhere.

  • What is the best way to communicate employee benefits so employees understand and use them?

    Employees are more likely to value and use workplace benefits when communication is clear, relevant and ongoing. The most effective approach is to explain not just what each benefit is, but why it matters, who it is for, how to access it and the potential value to the employee.

    Benefits communication works best when it is delivered through multiple channels, uses plain English, includes real-life examples and is repeated throughout the year rather than only at enrolment or renewal.

    Why this matters

    Many employers invest significantly in benefits, but employees often underestimate their value or do not know they exist. Poor communication can lead to low engagement, reduced appreciation of the reward package and missed opportunities for employees to improve their financial, physical or mental wellbeing.

    What the answer depends on

    The right communication strategy depends on:

    • The size and demographics of the workforce.
    • Whether employees work remotely, on-site or in the field.
    • The complexity of the benefits offered.
    • Employees’ levels of financial and benefits knowledge.
    • The technology available for communication and enrolment.

    Common mistakes include using technical jargon, overwhelming employees with too much information at once, focusing on features rather than outcomes and assuming one communication will be enough.

    How Wingate would look at this

    From a financial wellbeing perspective, communication should focus on decisions rather than product features. For example, instead of explaining what a pension scheme is, explain how pension contributions, tax relief and employer contributions may affect long-term retirement outcomes.

    At Wingate, we would usually encourage employers to build benefit communications around real employee questions, such as:

    • Am I saving enough for retirement?
    • How does private medical insurance help me?
    • What financial support is available if my circumstances change?

    This helps employees connect benefits to their personal situations and make more informed decisions.

    What to do before acting

    Review your current benefits communications and test whether an employee with no prior knowledge could understand:

    • What the benefit is.
    • Why it may be valuable.
    • Any costs or limitations.
    • How to access it.
    • Where to get further information.

    Consider creating a year-round communication calendar that includes benefit launches, reminders, educational content, employee stories and key enrolment dates.

^ Back to Top ^

Employee Wellbeing

  • How can an Employee Assistance Programme help support employee mental health?

    Employee Assistance Programmes (EAPs) support mental health by providing employees with confidential access to professional support when they are struggling with personal, emotional, financial or work-related challenges.

    Depending on the provider, support may include telephone counselling, structured counselling sessions, mental health resources, wellbeing apps, manager support services, critical incident support and signposting to specialist organisations.

    An EAP is not a replacement for clinical mental health services, but it can provide an accessible first point of contact that helps employees seek support earlier and access appropriate guidance before issues become more serious.

    Why this matters

    Mental health challenges can affect employees in different ways, from stress and anxiety to difficulties caused by financial concerns, family issues, bereavement or workplace pressures.

    Without support, these challenges may contribute to reduced wellbeing, increased absence, lower engagement or difficulties maintaining performance at work.

    An EAP can provide a confidential support route that employees can access independently, often without needing to inform their manager or HR team. For some employees, this privacy can be an important factor in whether they seek help.

    What the answer depends on

    The level of mental health support available will depend on:

    • The scope of the EAP provider’s services.
    • Whether counselling is included and, if so, how many sessions are available.
    • Access methods such as telephone, video, online chat or digital resources.
    • Availability outside normal working hours.
    • Whether support is available for family members.
    • How effectively the benefit is communicated to employees.
    • The wider wellbeing culture within the organisation.

    A common misconception is that an EAP only provides counselling. Many programmes also offer support for financial wellbeing, legal concerns, family issues and practical life challenges that can have a significant impact on mental wellbeing.

    Another mistake is assuming that introducing an EAP alone will resolve workplace wellbeing concerns. Mental health support is often most effective when it forms part of a broader wellbeing strategy.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate Benefit Solutions, we would typically view an EAP as an important foundation within a wider employee wellbeing programme.

    The strongest outcomes usually come when employers combine an EAP with effective manager training, clear wellbeing communications, supportive workplace policies and complementary employee benefits. Employees are far more likely to use support services when they understand what is available, trust the confidentiality of the service and feel encouraged to prioritise their wellbeing.

    We would also encourage employers to look beyond utilisation figures alone. While engagement data is important, employers should also consider whether the EAP supports wider objectives around employee wellbeing, workforce resilience, absence management and creating a supportive workplace culture.

    The value of an EAP is often determined less by the service itself and more by how well it is embedded within the organisation.

    What to do before acting

    If you are reviewing an existing EAP or considering introducing one:

    • Assess the mental health and wellbeing needs of your workforce.
    • Review what support is already available.
    • Understand exactly what services each provider includes.
    • Check access routes, availability and confidentiality arrangements.
    • Ensure managers know how and when to signpost employees.
    • Develop a communication plan to promote awareness throughout the year.
    • Monitor engagement and employee feedback after implementation.

    Employers who actively promote and support their EAP are typically more likely to see meaningful employee engagement than those who treat it as a passive benefit.

  • Are Employee Assistance Programmes worthwhile, or are they just a box-ticking exercise?

    Not necessarily. An Employee Assistance Programme (EAP) can be a valuable employee benefit when it is well chosen, well communicated and actively supported by the organisation. However, an EAP can become a box-ticking exercise if employees do not know it exists, do not trust its confidentiality, or are unclear about how it can help.

    An effective EAP typically provides employees with confidential access to support for issues such as mental wellbeing, financial concerns, family problems, bereavement, legal guidance and other personal challenges that may affect their wellbeing and work performance. The value comes not from having an EAP in place, but from employees feeling able and willing to use it.

    Why this matters

    Many employers invest in wellbeing benefits with good intentions but see little engagement because employees are unaware of the support available or do not understand its purpose.

    An underused EAP may represent poor value for money. More importantly, it may mean employees are not accessing support that could help them deal with challenges before they have a wider impact on wellbeing, absence levels, productivity or employee retention.

    What the answer depends on

    The effectiveness of an EAP often depends on:

    • How well the benefit is communicated.
    • Whether employees trust the confidentiality of the service.
    • The range and quality of support available.
    • How easy it is to access help.
    • Whether managers understand when and how to signpost employees.
    • The culture of the organisation.
    • The specific wellbeing challenges facing the workforce.

    One common mistake is assuming that introducing an EAP alone will improve employee wellbeing. The presence of a service does not guarantee engagement or positive outcomes.

    Another trap is measuring value purely through utilisation rates. While usage data can be helpful, a relatively small number of interventions may still have a significant positive impact on employees and the organisation.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate Benefit Solutions, we would usually view an EAP as one component of a wider wellbeing and employee benefits strategy rather than a standalone solution.

    The most successful employers tend to treat an EAP as an active support service rather than an insurance policy they hope employees never need. That often means regular promotion, manager awareness training, employee education and ensuring the benefit remains relevant to workforce needs.

    We would also look at whether other benefits complement the EAP. For example, financial wellbeing support, health cash plans, private medical insurance, income protection and wellbeing initiatives can all play different roles within an overall employee benefits programme.

    The key question is not whether the organisation has an EAP. It is whether employees understand it, trust it and feel comfortable using it when they need support.

    What to do before acting

    Before selecting, renewing or replacing an EAP, employers should:

    • Review employee engagement and utilisation data.
    • Assess how the service is currently promoted.
    • Gather employee feedback where appropriate.
    • Understand the range of support available and any limitations.
    • Ensure managers know how to signpost employees appropriately.
    • Consider how the EAP fits alongside other wellbeing and employee benefits.

    An EAP is most likely to deliver value when it is part of a broader commitment to employee wellbeing rather than a benefit that is only mentioned once a year.

  • Why do employers offer virtual GP services as an employee benefit?

    Virtual GP services can help employees access medical advice more quickly and conveniently than waiting for a traditional appointment. Many services offer same-day or rapid access to a qualified GP by video or telephone, often outside normal working hours.

    For employers, the main benefits are improved employee wellbeing, earlier intervention for health concerns, reduced time away from work, and a more valuable wellbeing package. For employees, the benefit is convenient access to healthcare without the need to travel or spend time waiting for appointments.

    Why this matters

    Delayed access to healthcare can lead to longer absences, increased stress, and reduced productivity. When employees can speak to a GP quickly, minor health concerns may be addressed before they become more serious issues.

    Virtual GP services can also support employees who work remotely, travel frequently, have caring responsibilities, or struggle to attend appointments during standard surgery hours.

    What the answer depends on

    The value of a virtual GP service depends on:

    • Appointment availability and service hours
    • Whether family members are covered
    • The range of services included, such as prescriptions, referrals, fit notes, or mental wellbeing support
    • Employee awareness and adoption of the benefit
    • How effectively the service complements, rather than replaces, NHS healthcare

    A common misunderstanding is that virtual GP services replace an employee’s registered NHS GP. In practice, they are usually designed to provide additional access and support.

    How Wingate would look at this

    Employee benefits should be assessed not only on cost but also on employee engagement and real-world value. Virtual GP services are often among the most visible and frequently used health benefits because they provide a practical solution to a common problem: timely access to medical advice.

    For employers, the key question is whether the service improves workforce wellbeing, supports retention, and helps reduce avoidable absence. Measuring usage and employee feedback is often as important as comparing headline costs.

    What to do before acting

    Before selecting a provider, check:

    • Expected appointment wait times
    • Clinical governance and regulatory standards
    • Whether dependants are included
    • Prescription and referral arrangements
    • Integration with existing health or wellbeing benefits
    • Employee communication and launch support

    A service that employees understand and use will generally deliver more value than a broader benefit that remains largely unknown.

  • How can you measure the ROI of your wellbeing programme?

    Measuring the return on investment (ROI) of a wellbeing programme is not always straightforward because the benefits often extend beyond direct financial savings. However, employers can assess whether a programme is delivering value by measuring changes in employee engagement, absence trends, benefit utilisation, retention, recruitment outcomes and employee feedback.

    Rather than focusing solely on a single ROI figure, many employers achieve a more meaningful assessment by looking at a combination of financial, operational and employee experience measures over time.

    Why this matters

    Wellbeing budgets are increasingly scrutinised, particularly when organisations are balancing multiple priorities and competing demands for investment.

    Without clear measurement, employers may struggle to understand whether a wellbeing programme is supporting workforce objectives or simply adding cost. Equally, programmes that provide genuine value may be overlooked if success is only measured through direct financial savings.

    Understanding what success looks like from the outset can help employers make better decisions about future investment and programme design.

    What the answer depends on

    The most appropriate measures will depend on what the organisation is trying to achieve.

    For example:

    • If the objective is reducing sickness absence, absence trends may be a key metric.
    • If the objective is improving employee support, utilisation rates and employee feedback may be more relevant.
    • If the objective is recruitment and retention, employee turnover and attraction metrics may be important.
    • If the objective is increasing awareness of available support, engagement data may provide useful insight.

    Common measures used by employers include:

    • Sickness absence rates.
    • Benefit utilisation levels.
    • Employee engagement survey results.
    • Employee retention rates.
    • Recruitment outcomes.
    • EAP usage trends.
    • Uptake of health and wellbeing benefits.
    • Employee feedback and sentiment.
    • Manager feedback.
    • Wellbeing programme participation rates.

    A common mistake is assuming that high utilisation automatically means success. In some cases, low utilisation may indicate low awareness. In others, it could reflect a workforce with lower need for a particular service.

    Similarly, it can be difficult to prove that changes in absence or retention are directly caused by a wellbeing programme, as many other factors can influence workforce outcomes.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate Benefit Solutions, we would usually encourage employers to start with clear objectives before thinking about ROI.

    A wellbeing programme designed to support retention should not necessarily be measured in the same way as one designed to improve health awareness or provide mental health support.

    We would also look beyond direct financial return. Some benefits provide value because they strengthen the employee experience, support organisational culture or improve employee confidence in the organisation’s commitment to wellbeing. These outcomes can be harder to quantify but may still contribute to long-term business objectives.

    Rather than asking, “What is the ROI of our wellbeing programme?”, a more useful question is often, “Is our wellbeing programme helping us achieve the outcomes we set out to achieve?”

    The most effective measurement frameworks combine quantitative data with qualitative feedback to build a more complete picture of success.

    What to do before acting

    Before reviewing the success of a wellbeing programme:

    • Define what success looks like.
    • Establish baseline measures before implementation.
    • Track outcomes consistently over time.
    • Compare results against original objectives.
    • Gather employee and manager feedback.
    • Review utilisation alongside employee awareness.
    • Consider both financial and non-financial outcomes.
    • Avoid relying on a single metric to determine success.

    A wellbeing programme is often most valuable when it is reviewed as part of a broader people strategy rather than assessed purely on short-term cost savings.

  • How can employee benefits support the different pillars of wellbeing?

    Employee benefits can play an important role in supporting the different pillars of wellbeing, but only when they are aligned with the needs of the workforce and the organisation’s wellbeing strategy.

    While wellbeing frameworks vary, employers commonly focus on pillars such as physical wellbeing, mental wellbeing, financial wellbeing, social wellbeing and, in some cases, career wellbeing. Different benefits support different areas, and no single benefit is likely to address every aspect of employee wellbeing.

    The most effective wellbeing strategies typically combine benefits, communication, education and workplace culture rather than relying on any one product or programme.

    Why this matters

    Employers sometimes invest in wellbeing benefits without considering which wellbeing challenges they are trying to address.

    For example, introducing private medical insurance may support physical wellbeing, but it may do little to address financial stress. Equally, offering financial education may help employees feel more confident about money, but it will not replace access to mental health support when it is needed.

    Understanding how benefits align with wellbeing pillars can help employers build a more balanced benefits programme and avoid gaps in support.

    What the answer depends on

    The benefits that best support wellbeing will depend on:

    • The demographics of the workforce.
    • Employee feedback and engagement levels.
    • Common wellbeing challenges across the organisation.
    • Available budget.
    • Existing benefits and support services.
    • Recruitment, retention and wellbeing objectives.

    Examples of how benefits may support different wellbeing pillars include:

    • Physical wellbeing:
      • Private medical insurance.
      • Health cash plans.
      • Health screening.
      • Dental cover.
      • Gym and fitness benefits.
    • Mental wellbeing:
      • Employee Assistance Programmes (EAPs).
      • Mental health support services.
      • Wellbeing platforms.
      • Manager wellbeing training.
    • Financial wellbeing:
      • Pension schemes.
      • Financial education.
      • Workplace savings programmes.
      • Salary sacrifice arrangements where appropriate.
      • Debt and budgeting support.
    • Social wellbeing:
      • Volunteering initiatives.
      • Employee networks.
      • Recognition programmes.
      • Team-based wellbeing activities.
    • Career wellbeing:
      • Learning and development programmes.
      • Coaching and mentoring.
      • Career progression support.
      • Professional qualifications.

    A common mistake is assuming wellbeing is primarily about mental health. In practice, employees’ wellbeing is often influenced by a combination of health, finances, relationships and work-related factors.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate Benefit Solutions, we would usually start with the outcomes an employer is trying to achieve rather than selecting benefits first.

    A wellbeing strategy is often strongest when benefits complement one another across several wellbeing pillars. For example, an organisation might combine an EAP to support mental wellbeing, a health cash plan for physical wellbeing and financial education to help employees feel more confident about their finances.

    We would also consider employee engagement. A broad range of benefits may appear comprehensive on paper, but if employees do not understand or use them, the wellbeing impact is likely to be limited.

    The goal is not necessarily to provide benefits within every wellbeing pillar. The goal is to create a balanced package that supports workforce needs and delivers meaningful value to employees.

    What to do before acting

    Before reviewing or introducing wellbeing benefits, employers should:

    • Identify the key wellbeing challenges affecting employees.
    • Review workforce demographic data and employee feedback.
    • Assess which wellbeing pillars are already well supported.
    • Identify gaps in current provision.
    • Review employee engagement with existing benefits.
    • Ensure benefits are supported by effective communication and education.

    A wellbeing strategy should be judged not only by the benefits available but also by whether employees understand, value and access the support being provided.

^ Back to Top ^

Healthcare

  • Should an employer use private medical insurance or a healthcare trust for employee healthcare benefits?

    Private medical insurance (PMI) and a healthcare trust can both provide employees with access to private healthcare, but they work differently.

    With PMI, an employer pays an insurance premium to an insurer, which then carries most of the risk of future medical claims under the policy terms. With a healthcare trust, the employer sets aside funds to pay healthcare claims directly, usually with a specialist administrator handling claims and day-to-day operation.

    In simple terms, PMI transfers risk to an insurer, while a healthcare trust allows the employer to retain more of the risk in exchange for greater flexibility and potentially lower long-term costs.

    Why this matters

    The choice affects costs, budgeting, benefit design, administration and risk.

    Smaller employers often prefer PMI because costs are more predictable and administration is simpler. Larger employers with substantial healthcare spend may consider a healthcare trust because it can provide greater transparency over claims costs and more control over the benefits offered.

    What the answer depends on

    Key factors include:

    • The number of employees covered.
    • Expected healthcare claims costs.
    • The employer’s willingness to accept claims volatility.
    • The importance of cost certainty versus flexibility.
    • Governance and administrative requirements.
    • Tax considerations, including Insurance Premium Tax (IPT), which generally applies to insured PMI arrangements but not to the healthcare trust fund itself.

    A common trap is focusing only on headline savings. Healthcare trusts can be more cost-effective for some organisations, but the employer is exposed to claims experience and may need additional protections such as stop-loss insurance.

    How Wingate would look at this

    The cheapest option is not always the best option.

    At Wingate, we would usually look at workforce size, claims history, budgeting requirements, employee expectations and the wider benefits strategy. A healthcare trust can offer flexibility and transparency, but only if the employer is comfortable managing the associated risks. PMI may provide better budget certainty even if the headline cost is higher.

    What to do before acting

    Before changing from PMI to a healthcare trust, obtain:

    • Claims history for several years.
    • Details of current benefits and exclusions.
    • Projected funding requirements.
    • Information on governance and trustee responsibilities.
    • Advice on tax, legal and employment implications.

    A planner or employee benefits consultant would normally compare the financial risk retained under a trust against the certainty provided by insurance before making a recommendation.

  • How can an employer redesign a private medical insurance scheme to reduce costs without significantly reducing employee value?

    If your company’s private medical insurance (PMI) costs are rising, reducing cover is only one of several options. Employers can often achieve meaningful savings by redesigning the scheme, changing underwriting arrangements, introducing excesses, adjusting hospital access, reviewing outpatient limits, or targeting benefits more carefully.

    The key question is not simply how to lower premiums, but whether changes could increase sickness absence, harm recruitment and retention, or reduce the value employees place on the benefit.

    Why this matters

    PMI premiums have been increasing across many employer schemes due to medical inflation, higher treatment costs, increased utilisation and growing demand for private healthcare.

    A poorly planned cost-cutting exercise can create false economies. Savings achieved through reduced cover may be offset by increased absence, slower return-to-work times, lower employee engagement or reduced competitiveness in recruitment.

    What the answer depends on

    The best approach will depend on:

    • Scheme size and demographics.
    • Claims experience over recent years.
    • Average employee age.
    • Whether cover includes dependants.
    • Current excess levels.
    • Outpatient and mental health limits.
    • Hospital network selection.
    • Underwriting basis and insurer flexibility.
    • Recruitment and retention objectives.

    Common cost-control options include:

    • Introducing or increasing a member excess.
    • Moving from full outpatient cover to capped outpatient benefits.
    • Restricting access to premium hospital lists where appropriate.
    • Offering employee-funded dependant cover rather than employer-funded cover.
    • Creating different benefit levels for different employee groups.
    • Using cash plans, virtual GP services or wellbeing programmes alongside a leaner PMI structure.
    • Running a competitive market review at renewal.

    Potential traps include making multiple benefit reductions simultaneously, creating employee dissatisfaction, or choosing a structure that looks cheaper initially but leads to higher claims costs or poor renewal outcomes later.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually look beyond next year’s premium. The real question is whether the scheme continues to support workforce health, absence management, recruitment and retention objectives at an acceptable cost.

    A planner or employee benefits consultant would normally compare the expected premium saving against the financial impact of sickness absence, staff turnover and lost productivity. The cheapest scheme is not always the most cost-effective.

    What to do before acting

    Before changing the scheme, gather:

    • At least three years of claims data.
    • Current insurer renewal terms.
    • Employee utilisation data where available.
    • Workforce age profile.
    • Details of benefits that employees value most.
    • Recruitment and retention metrics.

    Model each proposed change separately before combining changes. This helps identify which features drive cost and avoids reducing the perceived value of the benefit more than necessary.

  • Should my organisation offer private medical insurance or a health cash plan?

    Private medical insurance (PMI) and health cash plans are different employee benefits that address different healthcare needs.

    Private medical insurance is designed to provide access to private diagnosis and treatment for eligible medical conditions. Cover typically includes specialist consultations, diagnostic tests, hospital treatment and surgery, subject to the policy terms.

    A health cash plan is usually focused on helping employees with everyday healthcare costs by reimbursing eligible expenses such as dental treatment, eye tests, glasses, physiotherapy and other routine healthcare services up to defined limits.

    For employers, the choice is not simply about cost. It is about what problem the benefit is intended to solve and what employees are likely to value most.

    Why this matters

    Many employers compare these benefits purely on premium cost, but they can deliver very different outcomes.

    Private medical insurance is often considered where organisations want to support quicker access to diagnosis and treatment, potentially helping employees return to work sooner following illness. A health cash plan is often used to provide a benefit that a larger proportion of employees may use regularly throughout the year.

    Choosing the wrong benefit may mean spending budget on a scheme that does not align with workforce needs or employee expectations.

    What the answer depends on

    The most appropriate option depends on:

    • Workforce demographics and employee demand.
    • Available employee benefits budget.
    • Recruitment and retention objectives.
    • Absence management considerations.
    • Whether the organisation wants a highly visible benefit used by many employees or a benefit aimed at supporting more significant healthcare needs.
    • Whether family cover is important.
    • The level of employee engagement with existing benefits.

    A common mistake is assuming that private medical insurance automatically delivers greater value because it is more expensive. Equally, employers should not assume a cash plan is simply a lower-cost version of PMI. They serve different purposes.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate Benefit Solutions, we would usually start with the organisation’s objectives rather than the product itself.

    If the aim is to provide a healthcare benefit that most employees can access and use, a health cash plan may offer strong perceived value across the workforce. Employees often see a direct benefit through routine claims for dental, optical and other healthcare costs.

    If the aim is to support quicker access to medical treatment, reduce disruption caused by healthcare waiting times, or strengthen a higher-value benefits package, private medical insurance may be more appropriate.

    In many cases the decision is not about which benefit is “better”. The more useful question is which benefit best supports the organisation’s people strategy, wellbeing objectives, recruitment goals and benefits budget.

    What to do before acting

    Before selecting either option, employers should:

    • Review employee demographics and workforce needs.
    • Assess absence trends and wellbeing priorities.
    • Compare projected participation and utilisation rates.
    • Understand policy exclusions, claim limits and eligibility rules.
    • Consider whether dependants can be included.
    • Evaluate employee communication and engagement requirements.
    • Compare the benefit against other possible uses of the same budget.

    The most effective healthcare benefit is often the one that employees understand, value and are likely to use.

  • What happens if an employer increases or reduces the outpatient limit on a private medical insurance scheme?

    Changing the outpatient limit on a private medical insurance (PMI) scheme will usually affect both the cost of the policy and the level of cover available to employees.

    A higher outpatient limit generally increases premiums but provides greater cover for specialist consultations, diagnostic tests, scans and therapies carried out without a hospital admission. A lower limit typically reduces premiums but may leave employees paying more of these costs themselves once the limit is reached.

    The impact normally applies from policy renewal, although this depends on the insurer’s terms and any existing claims.

    Why this matters

    Many private medical insurance claims begin as outpatient treatment. Specialist appointments, MRI scans, blood tests and physiotherapy can often occur before any inpatient treatment is needed.

    A lower outpatient limit may save the employer money but could increase out-of-pocket costs for employees. A higher limit may improve access to diagnosis and treatment but comes with a greater cost to the business.

    What the answer depends on

    The outcome depends on:

    • How the insurer defines outpatient treatment.
    • Whether the limit is monetary (for example, £500, £1,000 or unlimited) or based on a set number of consultations.
    • Whether diagnostic tests are included within the outpatient limit or covered separately.
    • Any sub-limits for physiotherapy, mental health support or other therapies.
    • Whether the change takes place at renewal or during the policy year.
    • The claims experience of the scheme and the insurer’s underwriting approach.

    How Wingate would look at this

    The cheapest option is not always the most cost-effective. A planner would normally look at the wider employee benefit strategy, workforce demographics, claims patterns and employee engagement.

    For many employers, the key question is not simply whether premiums fall, but whether reducing outpatient cover could lead to delayed diagnosis, lower employee satisfaction or higher self-funded costs for staff.

    What to do before acting

    Before changing the outpatient limit:

    • Review recent claims data and identify how often outpatient benefits are used.
    • Check whether scans, diagnostics and therapies are included within the limit or covered separately.
    • Compare the premium saving against the potential reduction in employee benefits.
    • Ask the insurer or broker for illustration examples showing how common claims would be affected under each outpatient level.
    • Confirm whether the change affects all employees equally or whether different categories of staff can have different benefit levels.

  • How can employers manage rising private medical insurance costs without reducing the value of employee benefits?

    Rising private medical insurance (PMI) costs do not automatically mean employers need to remove cover or significantly reduce benefits. A combination of scheme design reviews, claims analysis, preventative health initiatives and regular market benchmarking can often help contain costs while maintaining a valued employee benefit.

    Healthcare costs have risen because of medical inflation, increased use of private healthcare services, greater demand for mental health support and an ageing workforce. Employers who take a proactive approach to reviewing their healthcare strategy are often better placed to manage long-term costs than those who only react at renewal time.

    Why this matters

    Private healthcare remains one of the most valued workplace benefits. However, large annual premium increases can place pressure on employee benefit budgets, particularly for small and medium-sized businesses.

    Simply reducing benefits may create employee dissatisfaction and damage the perceived value of the package. Equally, absorbing every increase year after year may not be financially sustainable.

    What the answer depends on

    The most suitable approach will depend on:

    • The size and age profile of your workforce.
    • Your claims experience and renewal history.
    • Whether premiums are driven by a small number of high-cost claims or wider usage trends.
    • The level of cover currently provided.
    • Employee expectations and recruitment objectives.
    • Whether alternative healthcare benefits already exist within your package.

    Potential pitfalls include removing benefits that employees value most, failing to review the wider market, or making short-term reductions that create larger recruitment, retention or wellbeing costs later.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually start by understanding what is driving the cost increases rather than immediately reducing cover.

    Typical areas we would review include:

    • Scheme design, including excesses, outpatient limits and benefit options.
    • Claims trends and utilisation data where available.
    • The potential role of health cash plans alongside PMI.
    • Market benchmarking to ensure competitiveness.
    • Employee education around virtual GP services and appropriate healthcare pathways.
    • Preventative wellbeing programmes, health assessments and early intervention support.

    A key planning point is that healthcare benefits should be viewed as part of an overall employee benefits strategy. The cheapest renewal is not always the best outcome if it leads to higher absenteeism, reduced productivity or lower employee engagement.

    What to do before acting

    Before making changes, gather at least three years of renewal and claims data where available, identify the main drivers behind recent increases, and assess how employees are actually using the benefit.

    Compare any proposed cost-saving measures against potential impacts on recruitment, retention, absence levels and workforce wellbeing. A thorough market review can also help establish whether your current insurer remains competitive.

  • Should employers provide dental and optical cover as a stand-alone benefit or include it within their private medical insurance?

    For most employers, dental and optical benefits work best as a separate benefit rather than as part of core private medical insurance (PMI).

    PMI is designed primarily to provide access to private diagnosis and treatment for acute medical conditions. Dental check-ups, routine treatment, eye tests and glasses are ongoing healthcare costs that often sit more naturally within a health cash plan or stand-alone dental and optical scheme.

    That said, adding dental and optical cover to a PMI arrangement can be attractive where simplicity, senior employee benefits or a premium reward package are priorities.

    Why this matters

    Employees tend to use dental and optical benefits far more frequently than PMI. A benefit that people use regularly is often valued more highly than one they hope never to need.

    Separating these benefits can also allow employers to offer routine healthcare support to a wider workforce without the cost of comprehensive PMI for everyone.

    What the answer depends on

    The best approach depends on:

    • Workforce size and demographics.
    • Budget available per employee.
    • Whether the aim is recruitment, retention, wellbeing or executive benefits.
    • Expected usage rates.
    • Existing employee benefits.
    • Tax treatment and benefit-in-kind considerations.
    • Whether the employer wants a single insurer relationship or multiple benefit providers.

    Common pitfalls include paying PMI premiums for dental and optical options that employees rarely use, or duplicating benefits already available through a health cash plan.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually start with the objective rather than the product.

    If the goal is supporting routine healthcare for the greatest number of employees, a separate dental and optical arrangement or health cash plan will often provide better value.

    If the goal is creating a premium benefits package for key staff, combining PMI with dental and optical options may be worth considering, particularly where administration simplicity is important.

    The cheapest option is not always the most effective. A planner would normally compare cost, employee take-up, perceived value and long-term benefit strategy before deciding.

    What to do before acting

    Review:

    • How many employees would be eligible.
    • Current healthcare benefit spend.
    • Likely utilisation of dental and optical benefits.
    • Whether a health cash plan could meet the need more cost-effectively.
    • Whether any PMI provider offers enhanced pricing when benefits are bundled.

    Request quotations on both a bundled and stand-alone basis, then compare employee value rather than premium cost alone.

^ Back to Top ^

Pensions

  • How can an employer tell whether their workplace pension provider remains competitive?

    A competitive workplace pension is not necessarily the cheapest. Employers should assess whether the scheme delivers good value for members through a combination of charges, investment performance, service quality, retirement options and member engagement tools.

    A useful starting point is to compare your current provider against alternative workplace pension providers on three broad areas: costs and charges, investment outcomes, and member service. These are also the key areas increasingly emphasised by regulators when assessing pension value for money.

    Why this matters

    For many employees, their workplace pension is one of their largest long-term assets. A provider with lower charges but weaker investment outcomes may leave people worse off in retirement, while a provider with stronger investments and better support could justify slightly higher costs.

    From an employer’s perspective, a competitive pension scheme can also support recruitment, retention and employee financial wellbeing.

    What the answer depends on

    Key factors to review include:

    • Annual management charges and any additional member fees.
    • Long-term performance of default investment funds, which is where most employees are invested.
    • The range and quality of investment options available.
    • Employer contribution levels compared with industry norms.
    • Retirement flexibility, including drawdown and support at retirement.
    • Digital access, member communications and educational tools.
    • Payroll integration and administrative efficiency.
    • Governance and value-for-money assessments published by providers, trustees or governance committees.

    A common mistake is focusing solely on charges. Investment performance and member outcomes can have a greater impact on retirement savings than small differences in annual fees.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually assess a workplace pension review through the lens of overall member outcomes rather than headline cost.

    We would typically compare charges, investment strategy, employee demographics, engagement levels, retirement options and governance standards. We would also consider whether the current scheme remains suitable for the workforce rather than assuming a provider that was competitive several years ago still represents good value today.

    What to do before acting

    Gather the following information before undertaking a review:

    • Current provider and scheme type.
    • Member and employer contribution rates.
    • Default fund details and performance history.
    • Full schedule of charges.
    • Governance or value-for-money reports.
    • Employee usage and engagement statistics.

    Then compare these against several alternative providers on a like-for-like basis. Be particularly careful if a change would require member transfers, as investment approaches, retirement features and scheme protections may differ.

  • How often should an employer review their workplace pension scheme?

    Most employers should review their workplace pension scheme at least annually, even though there is no specific legal requirement to conduct a formal yearly review. Regular reviews help ensure the scheme remains suitable for the workforce, contributions are being paid correctly, charges remain competitive, and governance standards continue to be met.

    Separately, employers have ongoing automatic enrolment responsibilities and must carry out re-enrolment and re-declaration of compliance every three years. A workplace pension should not be treated as a “set and forget” benefit, particularly as pension legislation, provider offerings and workforce needs can change over time.

    Why this matters

    A scheme that was suitable when first established may no longer represent good value or meet the needs of employees.

    Common issues include:

    • outdated contribution structures;
    • payroll and auto-enrolment errors;
    • higher-than-necessary charges;
    • poor employee engagement;
    • investment defaults that may no longer be appropriate for the workforce.

    Failing to review the scheme can create compliance risks and may mean employees receive poorer retirement outcomes than expected.

    What the answer depends on

    The appropriate review frequency will depend on:

    • the size of the business;
    • the complexity of the workforce;
    • whether contributions exceed statutory minimums;
    • whether there have been business changes, acquisitions or restructures;
    • changes to pension legislation or regulatory expectations;
    • concerns about provider service levels, charges or investment performance.

    Some employers undertake a comprehensive review every year and a lighter governance check more frequently.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually look beyond minimum compliance. A pension is one of the largest employee benefits many businesses provide, so the review should consider value for money, workforce demographics, contribution levels, employee engagement and overall employee benefits strategy.

    The cheapest scheme is not always the best choice. Equally, increasing contributions may not deliver the desired outcome if employees are disengaged or invested in unsuitable options. A review should assess how the pension works alongside salary, benefits, financial wellbeing initiatives and staff retention objectives.

    What to do before acting

    Before reviewing the scheme, gather:

    • current pension provider information;
    • contribution rates;
    • payroll and auto-enrolment records;
    • member uptake and opt-out statistics;
    • details of any workforce changes since the last review.

    A structured review should check compliance, charges, investments, governance, administration standards and whether the scheme remains appropriate for the business and its employees.

  • How much do I as an employer have to pay into an auto-enrolment workplace pension?

    For most UK workplace pensions used for automatic enrolment, the current statutory minimum contribution is 8% of qualifying earnings. Normally, at least 3% must come from the employer and the remaining 5% from the employee, with tax relief helping fund part of the employee contribution where applicable.

    These minimums are not always calculated on your full salary. In many schemes they are based on qualifying earnings, which are earnings within a specified band set by legislation. Some employers choose to contribute more than the minimum, and some schemes use different pensionable pay definitions.

    Why this matters

    Auto-enrolment has made pension saving the default for millions of workers, but many people assume the legal minimum is what they should save for retirement. In reality, the minimum contribution may not generate the retirement income you want, particularly if you start saving later in life or have gaps in employment.

    A common mistake is opting out without fully appreciating the value of the employer contribution and tax relief being given up.

    What the answer depends on

    The position depends on:

    • Whether you are an eligible worker who must be automatically enrolled.
    • The pension scheme’s definition of pensionable pay.
    • Whether contributions are based on qualifying earnings or another permitted certification basis.
    • Whether your employer contributes more than the statutory minimum.
    • Whether salary sacrifice arrangements are used.
    • Your tax position and how tax relief is applied.
    • Whether legislative thresholds and contribution requirements have changed since publication.

    Eligible workers are generally those aged 22 to State Pension age who earn above the automatic enrolment earnings trigger, although other workers may have rights to opt in.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate Benefit Solutions, we would usually start by distinguishing between the legal minimum contribution and the contribution level that helps an employer achieve its wider objectives.

    While many employers choose to meet the statutory minimum auto-enrolment requirements, higher contribution levels can improve the overall value of the benefits package, support employee retention and recruitment, and help employees build more meaningful retirement savings over the long term.

    What to do before acting

    Check:

    • Your latest pension contribution rates.
    • Whether contributions are based on full salary or qualifying earnings.
    • Whether your employer offers matching contributions above the minimum.
    • The impact of any salary sacrifice arrangement.
    • Whether increasing contributions would improve retirement outcomes without creating cashflow pressure elsewhere.

    It is also sensible to review your projected retirement income rather than focusing solely on contribution percentages.

  • Should I offer salary sacrifice for workplace pension contributions?

    Salary sacrifice (sometimes called salary exchange) is an arrangement where an employee agrees to give up part of their contractual salary and, in return, the employer makes an additional pension contribution of the same amount.

    For many employers and employees, this can increase pension saving efficiency because pension contributions are made from salary before Income Tax and National Insurance are calculated. Employees often pay less National Insurance, and employers may also reduce their employer National Insurance costs. Some employers choose to add part or all of their National Insurance saving to the employee’s pension.

    Why this matters

    A salary sacrifice arrangement can improve pension funding without increasing the overall cost to the employee. It may also help some employees reduce adjusted net income for tax planning purposes.

    However, it is not suitable for everyone. Salary sacrifice changes contractual pay and can affect calculations used by lenders, insurers, statutory benefits and other workplace benefits.

    What the answer depends on

    The potential benefit depends on:

    • The employee’s earnings level and tax position.
    • Whether salary sacrifice would reduce pay below the National Minimum Wage, which is generally not permitted.
    • The design of the workplace pension scheme.
    • Whether employer National Insurance savings are shared with employees.
    • Annual allowance and other pension contribution limits.
    • Whether mortgage lenders, life assurance arrangements or other benefits use post-sacrifice salary figures.
    • Future rule changes affecting salary sacrifice arrangements.

    A common trap is focusing only on tax savings. Lower contractual salary can have wider consequences which need to be understood before implementation.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate Benefit Solutions, we would usually look at salary sacrifice as part of the wider workplace pension strategy rather than purely as a tax-saving exercise. The key questions are whether the arrangement increases pension participation, improves retirement outcomes for employees, delivers a measurable benefit to the business, and can be implemented and administered effectively.

    For many employers, salary sacrifice can create employer National Insurance savings that may be retained by the business or reinvested into the pension scheme to enhance employee benefits. We would normally assess how the arrangement fits alongside contribution structures, workforce demographics, payroll processes, employee communications and broader reward strategies.

    The most effective arrangement is often the one that is straightforward for employees to understand, compliant with payroll and employment requirements, and aligned with the employer’s objectives for attracting, retaining and supporting staff.

    What to do before acting

    Review:

    • The pension scheme contribution structure.
    • Employee earnings against National Minimum Wage requirements.
    • The value of potential employer and employee National Insurance savings.
    • Whether employment contracts need to be amended.
    • The effect on life cover, income protection, statutory payments and mortgage affordability assessments.
    • Pension annual allowance considerations for higher earners and those making larger contributions.

    A written impact assessment and employee communication plan can help avoid misunderstandings and implementation issues.

  • Why is pension governance important for employers running a workplace pension scheme?

    Good pension governance helps an employer make sure its workplace pension continues to serve employees well, remains compliant with regulatory requirements and delivers appropriate value for money. Although the pension provider, trustees or governance bodies may carry out day-to-day oversight, employers still have an interest in monitoring whether the scheme remains suitable for their workforce.

    Poor governance can lead to higher charges, weak member engagement, poor retirement outcomes, administration problems and reputational risk. For employers, pension governance is not simply about compliance. It is about making sure a valuable employee benefit continues to meet its purpose.

    Why this matters

    Many employers focus heavily on selecting a pension provider but spend less time reviewing whether the arrangement continues to perform well. Automatic enrolment means many employees remain in default investment strategies for decades, often without making active decisions.

    Regular governance reviews can help identify concerns around charges, investment performance, retirement support, administration standards, employee communications and member outcomes before they become significant problems.

    What the answer depends on

    The appropriate level of governance will depend on:

    • Whether the scheme is trust-based or contract-based.
    • The size and complexity of the workforce.
    • The type of pension provider used.
    • Whether employees have access to salary sacrifice arrangements.
    • The quality of reporting available from the provider.
    • Whether there are regulatory or operational issues requiring monitoring.

    A common trap is assuming that because a provider has trustees or an Independent Governance Committee, the employer has no ongoing responsibilities. While formal governance duties may sit elsewhere, employers still need to ensure their workplace pension remains appropriate for their workforce.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually view pension governance as part of a wider employee financial wellbeing strategy rather than a standalone compliance exercise.

    A governance review would normally consider value for money, investment options, member engagement, retirement support, payroll processes and whether the pension arrangement still aligns with the employer’s objectives. The cheapest scheme is not always the best scheme if service quality, investment outcomes or member support are poor.

    What to do before acting

    Review the scheme’s governance reports, member outcomes, default investment arrangement, charges and service standards. Check how often the pension arrangement is formally reviewed and who is responsible for assessing value for money.

    Employers should also consider whether workforce changes, business growth or changing employee needs justify reviewing the existing pension provider or governance framework.

  • What should employers check before changing their workplace pension provider?

    Changing workplace pension provider can be worthwhile, but lower charges alone should not drive the decision. Employers should assess whether a new provider offers better value for employees, improved administration, stronger governance, suitable investment options, and ongoing compliance with auto-enrolment requirements.

    A pension scheme is often one of the most valuable employee benefits a business provides. The wrong switch can create disruption, additional administration, employee confusion, or unintended costs. The right switch can improve member outcomes and make pension management easier for the employer.

    Why this matters

    Many employers set up their workplace pension when auto-enrolment was introduced and have not reviewed it since. The pension market has evolved significantly, with improvements in technology, member communications, investment governance and administration.

    A provider that was suitable several years ago may no longer represent good value. Equally, moving providers without a clear objective can create unnecessary work and potentially disadvantage employees.

    What the answer depends on

    Key areas to consider include:

    • Member charges and overall value for money.
    • Quality and suitability of the default investment fund.
    • Range of investment options available to employees.
    • Online access, mobile functionality and member engagement tools.
    • Payroll integration and administrative efficiency.
    • Customer service standards and support for employers and employees.
    • Auto-enrolment compliance and regulatory requirements.
    • Whether existing pension pots will remain with the current provider or transfer to the new arrangement.
    • Whether employment contracts reference the current pension arrangement.
    • Whether a formal employee consultation is required before changes are made.

    Technical traps can include focusing solely on headline charges, overlooking payroll integration issues, failing to review default investment suitability, or not understanding how existing pension pots will be treated after the switch.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually start with the question: “What problem are we trying to solve?”

    A cheaper pension is not automatically a better pension. We would normally assess the decision across several areas:

    • Employee outcomes and retirement readiness.
    • Investment governance and default fund suitability.
    • Employer administration and payroll efficiency.
    • Employee engagement and communication.
    • Compliance and risk management.
    • The wider employee benefits strategy.

    For example, a scheme with slightly higher charges may still represent better value if it provides stronger governance, more appropriate investment options, better retirement support and a more engaging member experience.

    The best provider for a business with 20 employees may be very different from the most suitable solution for an employer with 500 employees, complex payroll arrangements or ambitious recruitment and retention goals.

    What to do before acting

    Before changing provider, prepare a structured review of your existing arrangement:

    • Document what works and what does not.
    • Compare charges, service standards, technology and governance.
    • Review the quality of the default investment strategy.
    • Check payroll integration requirements.
    • Understand how existing employee pension pots will be treated.
    • Review employment contracts and consultation obligations.
    • Ensure the replacement scheme satisfies auto-enrolment requirements.
    • Create a clear communication plan for employees before any transition begins.

    A well-planned switch should be based on improving long-term member outcomes and operational efficiency, not simply reducing costs.

  • Should my business use a master trust or a group personal pension (GPP) for workplace pension provision?

    For many employers, both a master trust and a group personal pension (GPP) can meet automatic enrolment requirements. The right choice is usually less about the pension wrapper and more about governance, member outcomes, administration, flexibility and cost.

    A master trust is a trust-based occupational pension scheme run by professional trustees who have a legal duty to act in members’ interests. A GPP is a contract-based arrangement where each employee has an individual pension contract with an insurance company or pension provider.

    Employers often favour master trusts where independent governance and delegated oversight are priorities. GPPs can be attractive where employer flexibility, insurer support and wider investment options are important.

    Why this matters

    The choice affects employees’ retirement outcomes, payroll administration, scheme governance, communications and the employer’s long-term pension strategy.

    A scheme selected purely on headline charges may overlook areas such as investment design, retirement support, employee engagement and governance quality. Equally, a more sophisticated arrangement may add little value if it does not suit the workforce.

    What the answer depends on

    Key areas to compare include:

    • Governance: Master trusts have trustee boards with fiduciary duties to members. GPPs are overseen by providers and independent governance committees, but governance operates differently.
    • Employer involvement: Master trusts can reduce the governance burden on employers by delegating oversight to trustees.
    • Workforce profile: Younger workforces, higher earners, directors and owner-managed businesses may have different needs from large populations of auto-enrolled employees.
    • Investment options: Some GPPs offer broader investment flexibility, although the gap has narrowed in recent years.
    • Retirement support: The quality of retirement pathways, drawdown options and member communications can vary significantly between providers.
    • Administration and payroll integration: Ease of operation is often more important than small differences in charges.
    • Cost and value for money: Charges should be assessed alongside governance, service standards and expected member outcomes.

    Common mistakes include focusing only on annual charges, choosing a scheme recommended by payroll software without wider assessment, or failing to review an existing scheme as the business grows.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually start with the objectives rather than the pension structure. A planner would normally assess the workforce, contribution strategy, governance expectations, retirement support, investment design and future business plans.

    A master trust may be attractive where the employer wants strong independent governance and minimal ongoing scheme responsibility. A GPP may be attractive where there is a desire for greater provider flexibility, integration with wider employee benefits or tailored investment approaches.

    The best value scheme is not always the cheapest. Long-term member outcomes, retirement flexibility and service quality can often matter more than small differences in annual charges.

    What to do before acting

    Prepare a comparison covering:

    • Current and expected workforce size.
    • Employer contribution levels.
    • Payroll and HR system requirements.
    • Governance expectations.
    • Investment requirements.
    • Retirement support needs.
    • Total member charges and employer costs.
    • Service standards and implementation support.

    If replacing an existing pension arrangement, check whether any valuable features, investment options or retirement benefits could be lost during a transition.

^ Back to Top ^

Protection

  • How much death in service cover should an employer provide for employees?

    There is no single “correct” level of death in service benefit, but many UK employers provide cover of between two and four times annual salary through a group life assurance scheme. Whether that is sufficient depends on who you are trying to protect and the financial commitments employees are likely to leave behind.

    For many employees, a simple multiple of salary may not fully cover mortgages, childcare costs, outstanding debts or the loss of future earnings. Equally, very high levels of cover can increase employer costs without delivering proportionate value.

    Why this matters

    Death in service benefits can be one of the most valuable employee benefits offered. If an employee dies unexpectedly, the payment may help their family meet immediate expenses, repay debt and maintain financial stability. A benefit that looks generous on paper can still leave a significant shortfall if employees have large mortgages or dependent children.

    What the answer depends on

    • The age profile of your workforce.
    • Typical mortgage and debt levels.
    • Whether employees have financially dependent partners or children.
    • Existing benefits already provided, including personal life insurance.
    • The cost of providing cover through a group life scheme.
    • Whether cover is a flat amount, a salary multiple or varies by role.

    Technical traps include assuming all employees need the same level of protection, failing to review salary definitions used by the scheme, and overlooking the fact that cover usually stops when employment ends.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually start with the purpose of the benefit rather than the headline multiple. The key question is whether the expected payout would make a meaningful difference to an employee’s family.

    A common starting point is three or four times salary, but the right level depends on workforce demographics, recruitment objectives, benefit budgets and wider financial wellbeing plans. Protection benefits should be considered alongside pensions, income protection, critical illness cover and the overall employee reward package.

    What to do before acting

    Review the average financial profile of your employees and estimate the typical support their families would need if income stopped unexpectedly. Then compare the cost of different cover levels with the value employees are likely to receive. Check the scheme rules carefully, including eligibility, salary definitions, benefit limits and trustee arrangements.

  • Should an employer offer Group Critical Illness Cover or Group Income Protection, and what is the difference?

    Group Critical Illness Cover and Group Income Protection both help employees when serious health issues arise, but they solve different problems.

    Group Critical Illness Cover normally pays a one-off lump sum if an employee is diagnosed with a specified serious condition covered by the policy, such as certain cancers, heart attacks or strokes.

    Group Income Protection usually pays an ongoing monthly income if an employee is unable to work due to illness or injury after a chosen waiting period. It is based on a percentage of salary and can continue until the employee returns to work, the benefit period ends, or retirement, depending on the policy terms.

    In simple terms, Critical Illness Cover provides a lump sum on diagnosis of a defined condition, while Income Protection replaces income when somebody cannot work.

    Why this matters

    A serious illness can create two separate financial challenges. The first is an immediate need for cash to deal with treatment costs, home adaptations or family expenses. The second is the loss of earnings if someone cannot work for an extended period.

    Group Critical Illness and Group Income Protection are designed to address different parts of that risk.

    What the answer depends on

    • Whether the illness is one specifically covered under a Critical Illness policy.
    • Whether the employee is medically unable to work.
    • The level of benefit selected by the employer.
    • The deferred or waiting period on the Income Protection policy.
    • The maximum benefit payment period.
    • Whether the employer already provides generous sick pay arrangements.

    A common misconception is that Critical Illness Cover protects against any long-term sickness absence. It does not. Claims are usually tied to specified medical conditions and definitions within the policy.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually start by identifying the financial risk an employer is trying to address.

    If the priority is protecting staff against loss of earnings during long-term absence, Group Income Protection is often the broader solution because it can cover a much wider range of illnesses and injuries that prevent someone from working.

    If the priority is providing a substantial cash payment following diagnosis of a serious condition, Group Critical Illness Cover may be more appropriate.

    Many employers view the two benefits as complementary rather than alternatives, because one addresses income replacement and the other provides financial support at the point of diagnosis.

    What to do before acting

    Review:

    • Existing sick pay arrangements.
    • Workforce demographics and employee needs.
    • Budget available for employee benefits.
    • Desired benefit levels and waiting periods.
    • Whether the aim is income replacement, diagnosis support, or both.

    The cheapest option is not always the most effective. A planner would normally assess how these benefits fit alongside life assurance, private medical insurance, wellbeing support and the wider reward package.

  • Should an employer use a registered or excepted group life assurance scheme?

    The main difference is that a registered group life scheme is treated as a registered pension arrangement, while an excepted group life policy sits outside the registered pension regime.

    For many employees there may be little practical difference. However, for people with large pension funds or significant death benefits, the choice can affect the tax treatment of benefits paid on death. Registered group life benefits can count towards pension-related death benefit limits, whereas excepted group life benefits are generally separate from those limits.

    Why this matters

    A high-earning employee with substantial pension savings could unintentionally create a tax issue for beneficiaries if death benefits exceed applicable limits. An excepted arrangement may help avoid that outcome in some circumstances.

    What the answer depends on

    • The employee’s total pension and death benefit position.
    • Whether there are employees with large pension pots.
    • The level of life cover being provided.
    • Whether any employees have protected pension allowances.
    • The employer’s preference for administration, flexibility and trust structure.

    Technical rules in this area have changed significantly following the abolition of the pension Lifetime Allowance and the introduction of the Lump Sum and Death Benefit Allowance (LSDBA). The interaction should be checked against current legislation.

    How Wingate would look at this

    The tax position is only one factor. At Wingate, we would usually consider the value of the death benefit, existing pension arrangements, employee demographics, estate planning implications and whether the added complexity of an excepted arrangement is justified by the potential tax saving.

    What to do before acting

    Prepare a list of:

    • the level of death-in-service cover provided;
    • any workplace and personal pension arrangements;
    • employees likely to have substantial pension wealth.

    Then check how death benefits would be taxed under both structures before deciding whether a switch is beneficial.

  • Can group income protection help employers retain staff?

    Yes, group income protection can support employee retention by giving staff financial protection if they cannot work due to long-term illness or injury. Employees know that if a serious health issue affects their ability to work, they may continue to receive a proportion of their income after a waiting period, depending on the policy terms.

    Many policies also include rehabilitation, mental health support, employee assistance programmes and return-to-work services. These benefits can help employees recover, remain connected to their employer and return to work sooner where appropriate. For employers, this can reduce the disruption and cost associated with long-term absence and staff turnover.

    Why this matters

    Replacing experienced employees can be expensive and disruptive. People often place a high value on benefits that provide financial security for themselves and their families. A strong protection package can improve loyalty, employee wellbeing and confidence in the employer’s long-term commitment to staff.

    What the answer depends on

    The value of group income protection depends on:

    • How generous the benefit level is.
    • The policy’s deferred period before payments begin.
    • Whether rehabilitation and wellbeing services are included.
    • How clearly the benefit is communicated to employees.
    • The wider benefits package offered by the employer.
    • The workforce profile and the types of health risks employees may face.

    A common mistake is focusing only on the income replacement benefit. In practice, the rehabilitation and early intervention services can be equally important in helping employees stay engaged and return to work.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually view group income protection as part of a broader financial wellbeing strategy rather than a standalone insurance product. The best outcome is not simply paying a claim. It is helping employees recover, protecting family finances and supporting a sustainable return to work where possible. Employers should assess how income protection fits alongside life assurance, critical illness cover, pension contributions and wider wellbeing support.

    What to do before acting

    Review your current absence levels, employee demographics and existing benefits. Check whether staff understand the protection already available to them, as an under-appreciated benefit may have little impact on retention. Compare the cost of cover against recruitment costs, sickness absence costs and the potential value of retaining experienced employees.

  • Should my business provide both Income Protection and Critical Illness cover for employees?

    For most employers, Group Income Protection is usually the more important benefit to consider first. Critical Illness cover can add valuable protection, but it serves a different purpose rather than replacing Income Protection.

    Income Protection typically pays an ongoing income if an employee is unable to work because of illness or injury. Critical Illness cover usually provides a one-off lump sum if an employee is diagnosed with a specified serious illness covered by the policy. An employee can be too ill to work without meeting a Critical Illness definition, which is one reason employers often prioritise Income Protection.

    Why this matters

    Many employees worry more about losing their monthly income than the immediate cost of treatment. A long-term absence can have significant financial consequences for both the employee and employer.

    Income Protection can provide ongoing financial support and often includes rehabilitation, mental health support and return-to-work services. Critical Illness cover can provide immediate financial help following a serious diagnosis, helping employees deal with mortgage costs, debts or other major expenses.

    What the answer depends on

    The decision depends on:

    • Your benefits budget.
    • The demographics of your workforce.
    • Whether you already provide life assurance, private medical insurance or other wellbeing benefits.
    • Your absence management objectives.
    • The level of cover available and whether it is employer-funded or employee-funded.
    • The claims definitions and policy terms offered by the insurer.

    A common misunderstanding is that Critical Illness cover protects earnings in the same way as Income Protection. In most cases it does not. Once the lump sum has been paid, there may be no further benefit.

    How Wingate would look at this

    The question is not simply which benefit is better value. An adviser would usually consider the wider context of what you’re looking to achieve.

    Income Protection addresses the risk of a prolonged loss of earnings and often provides wider support services. Critical Illness cover addresses the financial shock of specific serious diagnoses. Where budgets are limited, many employers choose Income Protection first because it covers a broader range of health-related situations.

    Where a business wants a more comprehensive protection strategy, the two benefits can work well together. An employee diagnosed with cancer, for example, may receive an immediate lump sum from Critical Illness cover and ongoing income support from Income Protection if they are unable to work.

    What to do before acting

    Compare the cost of each benefit against the risks you are trying to address. Review workforce absence data, salary levels, existing benefits and the level of financial resilience employees are likely to have.

    Before selecting a provider, check:

    • The deferred period for Income Protection.
    • The percentage of salary covered.
    • The rehabilitation and wellbeing services included.
    • The list of illnesses covered by Critical Illness policies.
    • Any limitations, exclusions or eligibility conditions.
^ Back to Top ^

Tax & Legislation

  • How is group income protection taxed for employers and employees?

    In most cases, employer-funded group income protection is a tax-efficient employee benefit. Premiums paid by the employer will generally be deductible as a business expense for corporation tax purposes, while employees usually do not face a benefit-in-kind charge simply because cover is provided. If an employee makes a valid claim, the insurer normally pays benefits to the employer, which are then paid to the employee through payroll and taxed as employment income under PAYE.

    The position can become more complicated where salary sacrifice or other Optional Remuneration Arrangements (OpRA) are used.

    Why this matters

    Group income protection can help protect employees from the financial impact of long-term illness while helping employers manage sickness absence costs. However, the tax treatment of premiums, benefits and salary sacrifice arrangements affects both the value of the benefit and the cost to the business.

    What the answer depends on

    Key factors include:

    • Whether the employer pays all premiums.
    • Whether employees contribute to the cost.
    • Whether cover is provided through salary sacrifice or another OpRA arrangement.
    • The structure of the policy and claim payments.
    • The employee’s tax position when benefits are received.

    A common misconception is that claim payments are tax-free. Unlike many personally owned income protection policies, benefits paid under employer-provided group schemes are usually taxable when paid to the employee through payroll.

    Another technical trap concerns salary sacrifice arrangements. HMRC’s treatment of certain group income protection arrangements has changed in recent years, and some cases can result in both a taxable employment benefit and taxable claim income. Any arrangement using salary sacrifice should be reviewed carefully against current HMRC guidance.

    How Wingate would look at this

    The tax position is only one part of the decision. At Wingate, we would usually assess group income protection alongside wider business and employee planning objectives, including key person protection, employee retention, health and wellbeing support, pension provision, death-in-service benefits and the overall reward package.

    A lower-cost arrangement is not always the most effective arrangement if it creates unexpected tax consequences for employees or added administration for the business.

    What to do before acting

    Before introducing or reviewing a scheme:

    • Confirm whether premiums are expected to qualify as a deductible business expense.
    • Check whether any benefit-in-kind reporting could arise.
    • Review any salary sacrifice arrangements already in place.
    • Understand how claim payments would be taxed through payroll.
    • Ensure employees understand the likely net income they would receive if a claim occurs.

    Rules in this area can change, so arrangements should be reviewed following relevant Finance Acts, Budget announcements and HMRC guidance updates.

  • Is group life assurance a tax-efficient employee benefit?

    In many cases, group life assurance is one of the more tax-efficient employee benefits available. Employer-paid premiums are generally deductible for corporation tax purposes if they are incurred wholly and exclusively for the business, while employees will not usually pay income tax or National Insurance on the cover itself. Death benefits are commonly paid through a trust and can often be received free of income tax and outside the employee’s estate for inheritance tax purposes, depending on how the arrangement is structured.

    Why this matters

    Group life cover can provide significant financial protection for an employee’s family at a relatively low cost to the employer. However, the tax treatment can vary depending on whether the scheme is structured as a registered arrangement or an excepted group life policy. Incorrect structuring can create unexpected tax charges for beneficiaries.

    What the answer depends on

    The main factors include:

    • Whether the arrangement is a registered group life scheme or an excepted group life policy.
    • Whether premiums meet the “wholly and exclusively” test for business tax relief.
    • How death benefits are paid and whether a trust has been established.
    • The employee’s wider pension and death benefit position.
    • Future inheritance tax and pension taxation changes, particularly where registered arrangements interact with pension death benefit rules.

    Technical traps include:

    • Assuming all death benefits are automatically tax-free.
    • Overlooking interactions with pension-related death benefit allowances in registered schemes.
    • Failing to review trust documentation and beneficiary nomination processes.
    • Using different benefit structures for different employees where excepted policy rules may restrict flexibility.

    How Wingate would look at this

    Tax efficiency is important, but it is only one part of the decision. At Wingate, we would usually look at the purpose of the cover, workforce demographics, benefit design, pension arrangements, business succession considerations and the potential impact on employees with substantial existing pension benefits.

    For some employers, an excepted group life arrangement may help avoid pension-related complications. For others, the simplicity of a registered arrangement may outweigh the potential drawbacks. The right answer depends on the wider benefits strategy rather than tax in isolation.

    What to do before acting

    Review:

    • The type of group life arrangement currently in place.
    • Whether benefits are written under trust.
    • The intended level of cover.
    • Whether any employees have significant pension wealth that could make the scheme structure more important.
    • The corporation tax treatment with the business’s accountant.

    Tax and pension death benefit rules can change, so the position should be checked against the latest legislation before implementation or renewal.

  • How is private medical insurance taxed when it is provided by an employer?

    In most cases, employer-paid private medical insurance (PMI) is a taxable benefit in kind. This means the employee will usually pay income tax on the value of the insurance provided, while the employer will normally have National Insurance and reporting obligations.

    The taxable value is generally based on the cost of the cover paid by the employer. Where family members are included, the cost of that additional cover is usually taxable as part of the employee’s benefit package. Certain health-related benefits, such as qualifying eye tests, some health screenings and specific return-to-work treatments, may be exempt under separate rules.

    Why this matters

    Private medical insurance can be a valuable employee benefit, but it is not usually tax-free. Employers sometimes focus on the insurance premium and overlook the additional cost of employer National Insurance contributions and administration. Employees may also be surprised when their tax code changes or their net pay is affected.

    What the answer depends on

    The tax treatment depends on:

    • Whether the employer pays the insurance provider directly.
    • Whether the cover is for the employee only or includes family members.
    • Whether the benefit is payrolled or reported separately to HMRC.
    • Whether any part of the benefit qualifies for a specific exemption.
    • The employee’s marginal rate of income tax.
    • Whether the arrangement involves salary sacrifice or optional remuneration rules, which can alter the tax position.

    Common traps include assuming all health-related benefits are exempt, overlooking family cover, or failing to account for employer National Insurance costs.

    How Wingate would look at this

    The tax charge is only one part of the decision. We would usually consider whether private medical insurance forms part of a broader remuneration and financial planning strategy, alongside pension contributions, life assurance, income protection and other employee benefits.

    For business owners, it can also be worth comparing the after-tax cost of providing insurance with alternative ways of rewarding staff. The cheapest tax outcome is not always the option that provides the greatest value to employees or supports wider business objectives.

    What to do before acting

    Check:

    • The annual cost of the policy, including any family cover.
    • The employer’s National Insurance position.
    • How the benefit will be reported to HMRC.
    • Whether any elements qualify for an exemption.
    • Whether salary sacrifice arrangements create different tax consequences.

    If the cover is being introduced as part of a wider benefits package, review it alongside pensions, protection arrangements and cash remuneration so the overall position is understood before implementation.

  • How does salary sacrifice reduce an employer’s National Insurance bill?

    Salary sacrifice can reduce an employer’s National Insurance (NI) costs because employees agree to give up part of their contractual salary in exchange for a benefit, most commonly an employer pension contribution. As the employee’s cash salary is lower, employer NI is generally calculated on a lower amount of earnings.

    For employers, this can create a recurring saving on NI contributions. Many businesses keep these savings, while others choose to share some or all of them with employees by increasing pension contributions. The arrangement must be set up correctly and reflected in the employment contract to achieve the intended tax and NI treatment.

    Why this matters

    Employer NI is a significant payroll cost. Where a workforce uses salary sacrifice for pension contributions, the NI savings can be substantial across multiple employees.

    The potential benefit is not limited to the employer. Some employers use part of the NI saving to boost pension contributions, which can improve retirement outcomes without increasing the employee’s overall cost.

    What the answer depends on

    The amount saved depends on:

    • How much salary employees sacrifice.
    • The employer NI rate applying at the time.
    • Whether employees are already below relevant NI thresholds.
    • The type of benefit being provided.
    • Whether salary sacrifice is implemented correctly under HMRC rules.
    • Whether post-sacrifice pay remains above National Minimum Wage requirements.

    What can go wrong:

    Incorrect contractual documentation can undermine the arrangement.
    Reduced contractual salary may affect mortgage affordability assessments, statutory payments, life cover linked to salary, or other employee benefits.
    Employees may not fully understand the wider implications of reducing contractual pay.

    How Wingate would look at this

    At Wingate, we would usually view salary sacrifice as a planning decision rather than simply a tax-saving exercise. The NI saving is valuable, but it should be considered alongside pension contribution levels, employee engagement, benefit design, recruitment and retention objectives, and the wider financial wellbeing of the workforce.

    A common opportunity is for employers to recycle some or all of their NI saving into additional pension contributions, increasing the value of the pension benefit without increasing payroll costs.

    What to do before acting

    Review:

    • Employment contract wording.
    • Payroll processes.
    • Pension scheme rules.
    • National Minimum Wage compliance.
    • Any employee benefits linked to contractual salary.

    Calculate not only the employer’s NI saving but also the impact on employees, including pension funding, statutory benefits and other workplace benefits that may be salary-related.

  • Is group critical illness cover tax-efficient for employers and employees?

    In most cases, employer-paid group critical illness cover is treated as a taxable employee benefit. The employer can normally claim the premiums as a business expense for corporation tax purposes, while employees are usually taxed on the value of the premium paid on their behalf.

    Where an employee makes a valid claim, the lump sum critical illness benefit is generally paid tax-free to the employee. The main tax cost therefore often arises from the ongoing premium rather than any eventual claim payment.

    Why this matters

    Group critical illness cover can be a valuable employee benefit, particularly for higher earners and key employees. However, many employers focus on the premium cost and overlook the employee benefit-in-kind implications, payroll reporting requirements and employer National Insurance costs.

    What the answer depends on

    The tax treatment can vary depending on:

    • Whether the employer or employee pays the premium.
    • Whether the cover is provided as a standard benefit or through a flexible benefits arrangement.
    • How benefits are reported through payroll.
    • Whether the policy includes any unusual features or investment elements.
    • The employer’s corporation tax position.
    • Changes to HMRC benefit-in-kind reporting rules.

    Potential traps include assuming the cover is tax-free because claim payments are usually tax-free, or failing to account for employer National Insurance liabilities on taxable benefits.

    How Wingate would look at this

    The tax position is only one part of the decision. At Wingate, we would usually assess group critical illness alongside death-in-service benefits, group income protection, private medical insurance, business cashflow and the overall employee reward package.

    A slightly more expensive benefit can sometimes provide better protection and employee value than a cheaper alternative, particularly if it addresses a meaningful financial risk for employees and their families.

    What to do before acting

    Before implementing a scheme, check:

    • Whether premiums will create a taxable benefit for employees.
    • Any employer National Insurance implications.
    • How the benefit will be reported through payroll.
    • Whether employees understand the tax consequences.
    • How the cover interacts with existing life assurance, income protection and medical benefits.
^ Back to Top ^

Are you ready to make informed decisions about your money?

Contact Us

Get in Touch

Footer Contact Form

You voluntarily choose to provide personal details to us via this website. Personal information will be treated as confidential by us and held in accordance with the Data Protection Act 2018. You agree that such personal information may be used to provide you with details of services and products in writing, by email or by telephone.

Please refer to our Privacy Statement to see how we use your personal information.